<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Arctic Rock Collection by Jasper van Grootel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contemporist.com/2009/07/16/the-arctic-rock-collection-by-jasper-van-grootel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/07/16/the-arctic-rock-collection-by-jasper-van-grootel/</link>
	<description>Contemporary Modern Architecture Furniture Lighting Interior Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/07/16/the-arctic-rock-collection-by-jasper-van-grootel/#comment-238123</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 02:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=4990#comment-238123</guid>
		<description>I appreciate where the idea is headed but I just can&#039;t do it. I don&#039;t find it appealing at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate where the idea is headed but I just can&#8217;t do it. I don&#8217;t find it appealing at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dyne</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/07/16/the-arctic-rock-collection-by-jasper-van-grootel/#comment-226504</link>
		<dc:creator>Dyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=4990#comment-226504</guid>
		<description>i agree with Rudy... although I&#039;m not a huge minimalist, I do find the many facets a bit unnecessary and a bit, well, ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with Rudy&#8230; although I&#8217;m not a huge minimalist, I do find the many facets a bit unnecessary and a bit, well, ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/07/16/the-arctic-rock-collection-by-jasper-van-grootel/#comment-226346</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=4990#comment-226346</guid>
		<description>Facets can be nice if they are integral to the structure. Distributing weight making the item stronger and less bulky.
In these examples it is only used as decoration. The massiveness of the furniture only degrades them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facets can be nice if they are integral to the structure. Distributing weight making the item stronger and less bulky.<br />
In these examples it is only used as decoration. The massiveness of the furniture only degrades them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

