Comments on: Lot 18 House by Arkitek Axis

By: ayaz rashid ch

ayaz rashid ch — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:26:29 +0000

ITS really good design with stright line. its a good design but in the night view there was a lot of lights which is not a good sign for energy consumption

By: prem

prem — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:22:49 +0000

being a malaysian, i will tell u that the design is sick, overdone and badly photographed! i don’t get the concept at all!

By: kast

kast — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:07:55 +0000

surely malaysian architecture lose its common tropical touch.its not suistainable at all because in the end of the day ..this solid brickwall will heat the building and its a full day of the use of air cond for me …

By: ALan

ALan — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:47:22 +0000

it’s good to host a party, product launching… not too sure if this is the client’s need or the designer’s. The house is definitely lack of warmth. Too busy with its architectural gestures, and forgotten about FF&E touches..

By: RKB

RKB — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:18:18 +0000

Definitely a lot going on here.. Some nice details like the lounge chairs but overall just too busy.

By: James

James — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:40:59 +0000

This is more appropriate to be a building products showhouse. There are no theme or uniqueness to the design. It is more a piece of modern art.

By: RBA

RBA — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:44:16 +0000

This is typical of malaysian architects trying too hard to look cool/modern. Ended up looking very disjointed, pastiche…basically just over-designed. Less is more.

By: Will

Will — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:12:12 +0000

The details are all covered here and overall the home is excellent!! Great Find

By: santi

santi — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:01:46 +0000

busy…busy…anyone else dizzy?

By: JW

JW — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:24:03 +0000

The architect was certainly a fan of the right angle… Looks more like a concept house.

By: Collby

Collby — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:56:18 +0000

Nopes. This is just sickening. The design is not fluid and it seems disjointed. It’s BAD TASTE.

By: Laura C. Bielecki

Laura C. Bielecki — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:20:03 +0000

Very beautiful high impact and dramatic residential interior! The details are very clean and exciting. One negative comment however is that the exterior seems a little overworked.
I give it a 8/10

By: boggeyman

boggeyman — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:22:19 +0000

i felt the overall design reeks of over’excitement’ in details and physical appearances. The architect could do much better with some restraint, i reckon.

By: Christian

Christian — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:04:13 +0000

it’s a bit of a mix’n'match, with a lot of really exciting details but maybe just too many. There is a clear line missing..
Otherwise I have to agree with Michael and Lorna: Those distorted photos might look funky, but they certainly don’t help the architecture!

By: lorna

lorna — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:12:27 +0000

agree with michael nash. nice tree/shrub in the backyard though.i’m different to the house design.

By: Michael Nash

Michael Nash — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:29:07 +0000

Too bad the photographer’s view camera made the dimensions appear even MORE distorted and disorienting than had he used an ordinary spherical wide-angle…

By: Lance

Lance — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:30:20 +0000

Let’s take everything we can about modern design, and some things we think are modern design and throw them and see if they stick. There is way too much going on that the really good details do get lost in the mix. A good bit of editing would probably produce a much better design.

By: LouisP

LouisP — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:13:18 +0000

Nice execution and some interesting details throughout, although it seems like the architect spent his entire bag of tricks and crammed it into this one house.

By: jr

jr — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:16:33 +0000

over-decorated..exterior and interior
agree with oliver

By: Oliver

Oliver — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:08:17 +0000

sorry … but for me this house is ugly and boring, too. Looks for me that the architects left hand don’t know what the right want – this is everything and nothing!