<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stone and Industry by Lex Pott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/</link>
	<description>Contemporary Modern Architecture Furniture Lighting Interior Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: audiovision</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/#comment-326309</link>
		<dc:creator>audiovision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5945#comment-326309</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the photographic print on the surface is unneccessarily. The rawness f the &quot;unfinished&quot; surfaces speaks for itself. It&#039;s a beautiful and commanding piece, and I agree with you, Remy, in that it&#039;s thought-provoking just because it exposes - indeed, embodies - the amount of energy that is expended on making objects that we as consumer(ist)s take for granted. It should go on public view somewhere. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the photographic print on the surface is unneccessarily. The rawness f the &#8220;unfinished&#8221; surfaces speaks for itself. It&#8217;s a beautiful and commanding piece, and I agree with you, Remy, in that it&#8217;s thought-provoking just because it exposes &#8211; indeed, embodies &#8211; the amount of energy that is expended on making objects that we as consumer(ist)s take for granted. It should go on public view somewhere. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augustino</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/#comment-278390</link>
		<dc:creator>Augustino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5945#comment-278390</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one table.

You should probably think of it like it&#039;s an art sculpture.

This is not a production piece of furniture. They will not make thousands of them. This is probably the only one they will ever make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one table.</p>
<p>You should probably think of it like it&#8217;s an art sculpture.</p>
<p>This is not a production piece of furniture. They will not make thousands of them. This is probably the only one they will ever make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/#comment-278380</link>
		<dc:creator>Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5945#comment-278380</guid>
		<description>I think you may be missing something Zero34.  Have you ever seen how much rock/ore must be excavated to smelt the metal necessary to construct a simple dining table?  Not to mention the energy used and the polution created!  This simple, raw, stone creation is by far less wasteful.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the stone panels removed from the core were also put to good use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may be missing something Zero34.  Have you ever seen how much rock/ore must be excavated to smelt the metal necessary to construct a simple dining table?  Not to mention the energy used and the polution created!  This simple, raw, stone creation is by far less wasteful.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the stone panels removed from the core were also put to good use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zero34</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/#comment-278129</link>
		<dc:creator>Zero34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5945#comment-278129</guid>
		<description>edit* bench should have been table. I just had bench stuck on my mind for some reason, and the fact that I see how this is made irks me to making mental lapses like that.. frustrating waste of natural resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>edit* bench should have been table. I just had bench stuck on my mind for some reason, and the fact that I see how this is made irks me to making mental lapses like that.. frustrating waste of natural resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zero34</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/#comment-278127</link>
		<dc:creator>Zero34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5945#comment-278127</guid>
		<description>Am I insane, or does this look like the LEAST environmentally friendly bench EVER? They took that huge rock and made a bench out of it? Not a bunch of benches, or bench tops, just one bench with an insane amount of waste... There&#039;s a nice aspect to the bench, but when I see it&#039;s source and it&#039;s process, I come to hate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I insane, or does this look like the LEAST environmentally friendly bench EVER? They took that huge rock and made a bench out of it? Not a bunch of benches, or bench tops, just one bench with an insane amount of waste&#8230; There&#8217;s a nice aspect to the bench, but when I see it&#8217;s source and it&#8217;s process, I come to hate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samwell</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/#comment-278123</link>
		<dc:creator>samwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5945#comment-278123</guid>
		<description>It looks like the photos at the bottom of the article showing how the rock is processed are indeed etched into the table top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the photos at the bottom of the article showing how the rock is processed are indeed etched into the table top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/18/stone-and-industry-by-lex-pott/#comment-278022</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5945#comment-278022</guid>
		<description>Am I insane or does it look like there are photographs somehow printed on that table top?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I insane or does it look like there are photographs somehow printed on that table top?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
