<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Villa in the Woods by Zecc Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/</link>
	<description>Contemporary Modern Architecture Furniture Lighting Interior Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:15:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rondav</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-296769</link>
		<dc:creator>rondav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-296769</guid>
		<description>at first blush- this is a really nice house... very modern with a sensual touch (texture.)

building composition is beautiful and fairly rigorous...

however, what is everyone&#039;s take on the stone (obviously in a &#039;stacked&#039; method) and clearly hanging out over nothing- unsupported... folly or flaw?

conversely, i love the texture comprising this modern composition, but the fact that this stackable material is unsupported is not making me smile (like i get some inside joke)- it makes me wonder what questioning &#124; editing the designers went thru to determine this material?!

am i making more out of this (otherwise) really nice home?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at first blush- this is a really nice house&#8230; very modern with a sensual touch (texture.)</p>
<p>building composition is beautiful and fairly rigorous&#8230;</p>
<p>however, what is everyone&#8217;s take on the stone (obviously in a &#8217;stacked&#8217; method) and clearly hanging out over nothing- unsupported&#8230; folly or flaw?</p>
<p>conversely, i love the texture comprising this modern composition, but the fact that this stackable material is unsupported is not making me smile (like i get some inside joke)- it makes me wonder what questioning | editing the designers went thru to determine this material?!</p>
<p>am i making more out of this (otherwise) really nice home?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-296726</link>
		<dc:creator>colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-296726</guid>
		<description>I love it.  I think it needed more glass and less stone but otherwise it&#039;s beautiful!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it.  I think it needed more glass and less stone but otherwise it&#8217;s beautiful!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chip</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-282296</link>
		<dc:creator>chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-282296</guid>
		<description>Rudy:

I&#039;m just not a fan of the result they have.

I don&#039;t really have a philosophy towards synthetic or real materials, and if a material is used to it&#039;s strength organically or contrasted, I just don&#039;t think it looks good here. 

The size and layout of the stone is something I&#039;m familiar seeing on fireplaces or in showers, or behind foundation plantings in new tract mansions in america. 

I think if it was a complementary element it would look fine, but the overbearing use of it is just too much (especially in the &quot;thin areas&quot; like overhangs), even if that is what makes it remarkable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just not a fan of the result they have.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have a philosophy towards synthetic or real materials, and if a material is used to it&#8217;s strength organically or contrasted, I just don&#8217;t think it looks good here. </p>
<p>The size and layout of the stone is something I&#8217;m familiar seeing on fireplaces or in showers, or behind foundation plantings in new tract mansions in america. </p>
<p>I think if it was a complementary element it would look fine, but the overbearing use of it is just too much (especially in the &#8220;thin areas&#8221; like overhangs), even if that is what makes it remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Crain</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-280737</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Crain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-280737</guid>
		<description>They are most likely HDR photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are most likely HDR photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v.shirazawa</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-280386</link>
		<dc:creator>v.shirazawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-280386</guid>
		<description>i hope it doesn&#039;t rain much at that site... looks like a small pond could form in the garage &amp; living room... Personally, I find the grey stone &amp; light timber to unexpectedly compliment the other via complete contrast. Though I probably would&#039;ve chosen a &quot;whiter&quot; wood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope it doesn&#8217;t rain much at that site&#8230; looks like a small pond could form in the garage &amp; living room&#8230; Personally, I find the grey stone &amp; light timber to unexpectedly compliment the other via complete contrast. Though I probably would&#8217;ve chosen a &#8220;whiter&#8221; wood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-280145</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-280145</guid>
		<description>chip, hold on, I don&#039;t get it. 
You say, the stone looks like some artificial stone veneer that tries to emulate real stone. 
Do you keep up this philosophy when you see real wood and compare it to printed veneer?
Or should every pattern that has been emulated avoided, when using the real thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chip, hold on, I don&#8217;t get it.<br />
You say, the stone looks like some artificial stone veneer that tries to emulate real stone.<br />
Do you keep up this philosophy when you see real wood and compare it to printed veneer?<br />
Or should every pattern that has been emulated avoided, when using the real thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-280110</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-280110</guid>
		<description>I think covering the entire building in stacked stone is far too overpowering, and the contrast between the dark stone and brown timber just doesnt work. Maybe if a much lighter, beech coloured timber was used it would blend much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think covering the entire building in stacked stone is far too overpowering, and the contrast between the dark stone and brown timber just doesnt work. Maybe if a much lighter, beech coloured timber was used it would blend much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eamonn</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279845</link>
		<dc:creator>Eamonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279845</guid>
		<description>I love it.  I&#039;ve seen use of slate and stone like this in rural places in Ireland and it really works.  I love it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it.  I&#8217;ve seen use of slate and stone like this in rural places in Ireland and it really works.  I love it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279669</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279669</guid>
		<description>This is a beautiful design</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a beautiful design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279482</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279482</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been said before on here, but many of the homes/buildings are photograghed soon after completion and have not had the opportunity to grow into it&#039;s environment...  Villa in the Woods is another good example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been said before on here, but many of the homes/buildings are photograghed soon after completion and have not had the opportunity to grow into it&#8217;s environment&#8230;  Villa in the Woods is another good example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chip</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279473</link>
		<dc:creator>chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279473</guid>
		<description>It is probably real, but the way they are using the stone really resembles the artificial stone veneers you see everywhere. Check out Coronado&#039;s ledgestones and it looks exactly the same. 

If it is real stone, I don&#039;t know you&#039;d make such an effort to emulate something that would look so synthetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is probably real, but the way they are using the stone really resembles the artificial stone veneers you see everywhere. Check out Coronado&#8217;s ledgestones and it looks exactly the same. </p>
<p>If it is real stone, I don&#8217;t know you&#8217;d make such an effort to emulate something that would look so synthetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279439</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279439</guid>
		<description>the way this building meets the ground and embraces the space in the woods is a disgrace - crude and vulgar; wouldn&#039;t even bother to talk about the building itself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the way this building meets the ground and embraces the space in the woods is a disgrace &#8211; crude and vulgar; wouldn&#8217;t even bother to talk about the building itself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coen</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279369</link>
		<dc:creator>Coen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279369</guid>
		<description>I like it. It&#039;s a rock in the woods. Washed clean by the rain. 
Did you notice the ground level towards the basement? 
About the pictures I agree being to clean. I bet these pictures are taking right after the acceptance! Nobody is living there at this moment that is probably why it is to clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. It&#8217;s a rock in the woods. Washed clean by the rain.<br />
Did you notice the ground level towards the basement?<br />
About the pictures I agree being to clean. I bet these pictures are taking right after the acceptance! Nobody is living there at this moment that is probably why it is to clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rika</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279311</link>
		<dc:creator>Rika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279311</guid>
		<description>I agree Aiban. The stone is too much. It looks like they did not know where to stop and just continued to the roof...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Aiban. The stone is too much. It looks like they did not know where to stop and just continued to the roof&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orhun</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279282</link>
		<dc:creator>orhun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279282</guid>
		<description>The client maybe owns the quarry.. Its a little too much stone really; it makes it hard to see beyond this aspect in the final product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The client maybe owns the quarry.. Its a little too much stone really; it makes it hard to see beyond this aspect in the final product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aiban</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279255</link>
		<dc:creator>Aiban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279255</guid>
		<description>personally, i don&#039;t like to &#039;clad&#039; stone on the first floor levels. Stone rises from the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally, i don&#8217;t like to &#8216;clad&#8217; stone on the first floor levels. Stone rises from the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279228</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279228</guid>
		<description>Not feeling this one at all.  The photography leaves much to be desired and I agree with AJ it looks &quot;manipulated&quot;.  The home does not meld with it&#039;s surroundings.  It&#039;s dominates them and is quite aggressive, regardless if they&#039;re real.  It definitely adds nothing to architecture or design... If it is real.  The only placed it would really work is on a white sandy beach or high in the hills overlooking an ocean.  Elsewhere...  Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not feeling this one at all.  The photography leaves much to be desired and I agree with AJ it looks &#8220;manipulated&#8221;.  The home does not meld with it&#8217;s surroundings.  It&#8217;s dominates them and is quite aggressive, regardless if they&#8217;re real.  It definitely adds nothing to architecture or design&#8230; If it is real.  The only placed it would really work is on a white sandy beach or high in the hills overlooking an ocean.  Elsewhere&#8230;  Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279211</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279211</guid>
		<description>These are real photos, not renderings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are real photos, not renderings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279190</link>
		<dc:creator>F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279190</guid>
		<description>me likey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>me likey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.contemporist.com/2009/10/21/villa-in-the-woods-by-zecc-architects/#comment-279177</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contemporist.com/?p=5978#comment-279177</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does this look like a rendering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does this look like a rendering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
