House in Bryanston by Nico Van Der Meulen Architects
Nico Van Der Meulen Architects have completed a new house in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Full description after the photos….

.
House in Bryanston by Nico Van Der Meulen Architects
Situated on a 4000sq.m stand in Eccleston Rd, Bryanston this is a new 1400 sq.m residence designed by Nico & Werner van der Meulen of Nico van der Meulen Architects cc. Interior design was done by M Square Lifestyle Design, and the furniture, interior decoration and feature lights were by M Square Lifestyle Necessities.
Due to the slope of the stand, a large basement was designed on the lower side of the property, creating a stepped effect on the stand.
Upon entering through the gatehouse you look down the sloping driveway with several large cantilevers protruding from the building, some in rust, other areas clad with unfilled travertine, and an atrium behind a mentis grating screen.
Next to the front door a large reflective koi pond flows over a retaining wall next to the drive way, with an illuminated glass staircase behind a two storey curtain wall in the background. The lift shaft forms a strong vertical element finished in rust behind the pond. All of this is framed by a cantilevered concrete beam. The staircase behind the koi pond is a double glass construction, with lights between the two layers of glass. Above the lower garage a huge cantilevered structure hangs out, suspended by beams built into its roof.
The front door is a large piece of pivoted frameless glass, leading into a double volume entrance hall and formal lounge with a view across the lounge and pool into the garden beyond. A bridge suspended by steel cables spans across this space.
The only wall in the lounge is a double height wall punctured by a 4m long fireplace and several illuminated niches, with a coffered ceiling with rope lights over it. All the other walls are glass.
The lounge leads directly onto the deck next to the pool through full width frameless stacking doors, and through the bar to the lanai. An atrium allows the residents to open the living rooms to cool breezes.
The study leads off from a hallway opening into another atrium, and this hallway connects with the garages and guest bedroom. To the other side you go past the atrium with the staircase leading up and down on the other side, to the family room, lift, dining room, kitchen and service areas. The family room is also double volume, with the private lounge off the main bedroom as a mezzanine to this area, and the covered balcony to the main suite cantilevering into the double volume space, covered in slats, painted grey.
The house was designed around three massive trees, one at the tennis court, and the other two on the east side of the house. The view from the hall towards the east is into one of these trees, framed by a large sliding window in the kitchen. You can feed the birds from the kitchen window!
To the north of the lounge, bar and family/ breakfast room is an oversized lanai and patio, with an eighteen metre infinity edge pool beyond that. The kitchen, breakfast room and family room leads seamlessly through wall to wall frameless sliding doors onto the patio, with the dining room situated behind the family room, sharing a fireplace with the family room. When the doors are open, the family room, breakfast room, open and covered patio and kitchen becomes one large area.
Parts of the dining room floor is glass, with a view down into the koi pond, and two huge lights from M Square are suspended over the dining room table. The kitchen is an open plan layout to the family room, breakfast room, and lanai. Behind the black glass back wall a pantry is hidden, and around the corner is a cold room and scullery/laundry.
The basement consists of a gym with spa and dressing room, home theatre with a wet bar, wine cellar/tasting room with separate areas for white and red wines, music room and a dance studio/ discotheque. The wall connecting these rooms has vertical slits lit with fluorescent lights at the back of the slits.
The first floor consists of three kid’s suites, with a pyjama lounge with its own mini kitchenette, and an open plan main suite with a private lounge and a panic room fitted with a kitchenette and desk/ dressing table.
All suites and the lounges leads onto balconies. The main suite has a covered balcony that juts into the family room below, and fireplaces in the private lounge, main bedroom and one outdoors on the balcony.
The main bathroom is divided by a fireplace from the main bathroom and built into the same tree as the kitchen below, again with a massive sliding panel opening into the tree. The toilet and bidet are housed in a dark glass enclosure to cut it off from the open plan suite.
A bridge suspended by stainless steel cable span across the double volume spaces, with views to north, east and south, and a bridge across the atrium below connects a large balcony to the house.
From the north the house is framed by several beams, with the pond spilling over a three metre wall. Due to its north orientation, sun control features and cross ventilation, the house can be used almost year round without artificial heating or cooling.
Visit the website of Nico Van Der Meulen Architects – here.
.
.









































BjZ on 28 Jun 2010 at 6:07 am #
Wow!!! This house seems to be celebrity styled or for someone who is more kind of “high end” (if you know what i mean).
It’s not my kind of thing though, too big, too fancy.
I like more average sized homes. Homes that are simple yet warm, inviting and just plain old homey. This one says to me “I’ve got mine, top this…loser”
Asif on 28 Jun 2010 at 6:36 am #
Fantastic piece of art. kudos
F-J on 28 Jun 2010 at 12:07 pm #
Refined complexities. Wow!
TW on 28 Jun 2010 at 5:09 pm #
This house is simply a mish-mash of gimmicky design elements. It’s as if the architect/home owner flicked through an architecture magazine and made a checklist of materials, finishes, furnishings and design ‘features’ that could be included.
This is a good example of why the Mies statement of ‘less is more’ is so brilliant. This house does the opposite. I have counted at least 8 different floor finishes, 4 types of balustrading, 6 different ceiling treatments…
This isn’t architecture. This is simply a big building.
And don’t even get me started on why an architect would allow a client to build something that is 1400sqm in size in this day and age.
Joel Sherlock on 28 Jun 2010 at 7:02 pm #
Stunning Design, well done.The mix of materials and textures is amazing. I love it.
kara lynn on 28 Jun 2010 at 8:44 pm #
this how is quite amazing.
some of my favorite parts are a master room’s bed. and how you were able to open up the main floor into open air.
absolutely stunning.
Pierre on 29 Jun 2010 at 3:15 am #
Johannesburg is still the City of Gold! Fantastic work.
marshen on 29 Jun 2010 at 3:20 am #
Grandiose and decadence in South Africa, how fitting. I like the custom light fixtures except the ones in the dining room. Nice collection of contemporary glass pieces.
Mr Simon on 29 Jun 2010 at 7:13 am #
This is over the top. Like how many sitting areas do you need in a mostly uninhabited house?
Something is a little off with the overall coherence. I agree with TW that it’s a mish-mash.
Fantastic materials but…
PH on 29 Jun 2010 at 9:22 am #
Hey TW,
My guess is that you are a young, idealistic architecture student with no tolerance for work that does not fit your sensibilitys. Imagine a world that only has what you like in it, kinda grim. Open you eyes and you will find value in these images. Your remarks are dimissive of work that clearly has many thoughtful and creative solutions. I do agree with you that there is a lot going on, probably too much.
One other thing, given the choice, designing big fancy houses for rich people that love your work beats the heck out of most alternatives. Stay thirsty my friend.
PH on 29 Jun 2010 at 8:21 pm #
Thanks PH for the almost-complement. I am actually a mid-40s architect that has seen too much rubbish built and has come to value what real architecture and design is about.
Yes I am dismissive of what architects are doing to our living environments. The “big fancy houses” of the early 80′s is what led to the gross landscapes of overbuilt, oversized, cheap houses that the bulk of people aspire to these days. Now THAT is a grim world indeed.
Architects should be pulling back now. It is up to us to convince our clients that sustainability is what they should be striving for.
I make no apology for that “sensibility”.:)
AP on 29 Jun 2010 at 9:14 pm #
I’m with TW and PH here – the house is quite over the top and much larger than should be built for a residential home in this day and age – unless the family living here full time has at least…ohh…11 children.
More so than being a mish-mash, it seems like the architecture doesn’t quite know what it wants to be. There are such a broad sense of materials & details – some of them extremely nice and warranted given the overall aesthetic/ concept that can be pulled out of this bohemeth of a project – while others seem to be simply placed for show.
A bit over the top for my taste, but either way, the craftsman ship looks top notch for the most part. Looks to get a little lax at the intersection of the baseboard and door jamb in photo #15 (exterior condition).
E_dy on 30 Jun 2010 at 12:25 am #
Well, personally I’ll just have to back up TW’s point of view. Our world has changed and architecture should reflect that.
Lots of ways of spending lots of money, not liking one of them doesn’t make one a thirsty cynic =)
Chaminda on 30 Jun 2010 at 12:28 am #
Has to agree with PH,less is more,it is to big and there are some conflicting designs
Ron Itoki on 30 Jun 2010 at 12:35 am #
I don’t think there are too many materials. It’s a big house, so it can handle many materials without looking like too much.
Realize that you’re seeing pictures of the whole house all at the same time, it would be a very different experience if you were actually in the house where you experience one room at a time.
TW on 30 Jun 2010 at 2:04 am #
Ooops! PH is me (TW). Not sure how I ended up with odd initials…
Sorry for the confusion.
Loki on 03 Jul 2010 at 4:02 pm #
I read in most middle class areas of South Africa a perimeter fence with barbed wire along the top is the norm ( along with 24 hr security). Looking at this house I can see why as it is obstentious to the extreme highlighting the disparities (and at 15,000 sq feet a tad bit oversized).
smART on 08 Jul 2010 at 3:14 am #
I disagree with TW’s first reply which says that “this isn’t architecture”. Does architecture always have to be “good”? If one building doesn’t suit your taste then should it be considered “not architecture”?
I do agree that this house offers just a little “too much”, but I strongly believe that we should pay respect to the architect. He managed to convince the owner to build it anw:)
Adrian Osborne on 10 Aug 2010 at 2:40 am #
I think South Africans need to get out the mindset of us having to lag behind the Americans and Europeans.Nico VD M is right up there and leading.I am a loyal HOMEOWNER buyer(Not Subscriber) and always look foward to NVDM’s designs.Now we even have M-Squared to enhance SA’s mediocre standards in interior designs (this is dressing your home-TOPSTYLE!!)
NVDM keep it up and show the world not only did you make beams your signature and living spacious trendy, you have made us proud.
driton on 12 Aug 2010 at 12:36 pm #
waw i love this design best regards from iceland
selinah dube on 22 Dec 2010 at 6:13 am #
i love this type of houses,lm building mine in zimbabwe and it,s the first glass house [so l heard by my friend who drew my house plan]even though my friends say the place lm building my house is not good for the house,l boughht the land years ago and l wasn,t sure what type of house l wanted,l love things that are different from others,even my shoes,clothes,hair do lm always different from the rest,by that l just love the house and l wouldnt mind nico to re-do my own plan.so if u can just do it.l love everything about it ,mine is not as big though as this one,but l love it and well done to the owners.l live in uk and their houses are not classy they love to keep their history houses.and its not wrong by the way