Williams Studio by GH3
Toronto-based firm GH3 designed the Williams Studio on Stony Lake in Ontario, Canada.

.
A photographer’s studio over a boathouse on Stony Lake is a re-imagination of the archetypal glass house in a landscape in the Canadian Shield. A continuation of thinking about this architectural ambition, the central concept of the house is reconceived through a contemporary lens of sustainability, program, site and amenity. The compelling qualities of simple, open spaces; interior and exterior unity and material clarity are transformed to enhance the environmental and programmatic performance of the building, creating architecture of both iconic resonance and innovative context–driven design.
The program envisions a building as north–facing window: a photographer’s live/work studio and film location that is continuously bathed in diffuse and undiminished natural light. The transparent facade—a curtain wall glazed in low-iron glass—becomes the essential element in a photographic apparatus to produce images unobtainable in a conventional studio. The availability and fidelity of north–facing light in the double-height space provide the photographer with unparalleled natural illumination, while the clarity of the glazing transforms the site and surrounding vistas into a sublime, ever–changing backdrop.
The compact glass form sits at the water’s edge on a granite plinth whose matte black facade dematerializes to suspend the building, lantern-like, on the site. The granite’s thermal mass exploits the abundant solar input, eliminating the need for active systems on winter days, while the lakefront site allows the use of a deep-water exchange to heat and cool the building year–round through radiant slabs and recessed perimeter louvers at the floor and ceiling. Sliding panes in the glass skin—three metres wide at the ground floor, and one and a half metres wide on the mezzanine floor—allow the facade to become completely porous for natural ventilation, while an individually automated blind system, white roof, and deciduous hedgerow guard against excessive solar gain. The continuous blind system additionally serves as a second aesthetic skin, transforming the interior into an enclosed, intimate space, and the exterior into a gently reflective mirror of the surroundings.
Entry into the site is facilitated through a minimalist landscape that deploys endogenous materials while leaving the greatest portion of the site in its evocative, glacier-scoured state. A simple granite plinth serves as threshold for the south-facing entrance, where solid program functions and vertical circulation are arranged in a narrow, efficient volume. From the outset, the goal was to accommodate the client’s needs within a small footprint. Domestic functions are integrated into a furniture-like mezzanine assembly suspended above the main space, where bedroom, bathroom and closet are coextensive, and sliding fritted glass allows the whole to be concealed from the rest of the space. Throughout the upper and lower levels, interior partitions are clad with seamless white lacquered panels whose reflective qualities diffuse light into every part of the interior and create complex layered views through the space.
Visit the GH3 website – here.
Photography by Larry Williams
.
.





























BjZ on 10 Nov 2010 at 9:40 am #
Wow! Could the interior be any more bland and boring?! Good grief!
SPG on 10 Nov 2010 at 5:19 pm #
chilly
Melissa on 10 Nov 2010 at 7:13 pm #
Fabulous!
TW on 10 Nov 2010 at 8:42 pm #
I love it! I couldn’t think of a better place for an artist to work.
The detailing is perfect – love the sliding opaque walls of glass. Love how every finish, fixture and furniture has been so thoughtfully positioned.
And they have dealt with an extreme terrain with an extreme design solution.
Ebru Kandilci on 10 Nov 2010 at 11:52 pm #
the position of the mass is really greater then everything about architecture.the balance of solid and water is charming.
matthew on 11 Nov 2010 at 12:49 am #
WOW.
this makes me want to go skiing really bad.
but also amazing architecture. its surprising you dont see more beautiful architecture in scenes like this [snow]
well executed, beautiful!
aj smith on 11 Nov 2010 at 8:59 am #
Too much White sterile feel. The Views are nice. Hope you like wearing sunglass all the time. The reflection inside and outside in winter would drive anyone mad.
aj smith on 11 Nov 2010 at 9:47 am #
With all the glass and tiled floor, would the need for heating alter the small enviromental footprint the client so badly wanted? It is Canada after all.
EJ on 11 Nov 2010 at 9:59 am #
Beautiful. What a great response to the site. Great details.
Maira Evans on 12 Nov 2010 at 6:31 am #
Are you actually allowed to build on that location. Isn’t considered a “river front” (bank) or “the woods”. How can someone purchase land there? The studio is interesting, yet too bland and cold. The scenery breathtaking. Again, I cannot get it..how can one build there?
Matthew Salo on 12 Nov 2010 at 10:00 am #
Fantastic response to the land. With a little colourful artwork up (after the architects have taken their portfolio pictures) it would be a great space.
Maira Evans: In Canada, sites like this are plentiful in the region known as the Shield – exposed granite left by the ice ages, etc. Much of the land is owned by the provincial governments, but they make sites like these available a few at a time as a source of property tax revenue. Depending on where in the country you live it is actually quite affordable to own a second home.
Jimw on 12 Nov 2010 at 10:46 am #
Love the deliberate contrast with its contextual setting, all the while exercising great restraint not to “up stage” the environment.
That’s one lucky bulldog!
Daniel on 13 Nov 2010 at 5:13 pm #
LOVE this design…the interior may be very minimalist, but I think that is the point…as a studio, the intention is to provide inspiration and in this case, natural inspiration. The architecture (as amazing as it is!) seems to frame the landscape beautifully!
Maira Evans on 14 Nov 2010 at 1:55 pm #
Matthew Salo: thanks for filling me in on this. In Europe (and the Mediterranean) you cannot buy land right on the shore or river banks. I’ve got some property there and I cannot build anything.
Jens on 21 Nov 2010 at 11:18 pm #
Yeah we have that to protect the nature from architects with rulers.
debunking on 26 Nov 2010 at 10:33 am #
What a bunch of nonsense text.
Can we please discuss exactly what about this work is sustainable? In the winter, this place will be freezing, even after the owner pays out their arse for heating. Oh wait, deep water exchange in the winter….right so you are heating with water that is 10C? Lovely. This system might save on heating, but its going to be BOATLOADS more heating than a conventional cottage that has, say 40% glazing. GLASS BOXES ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE (though they are sexy and mouth watering to some).
If they don’t plan to use it over the winter, then in summer, we have this thing called THE SUN. For those who don’t know (mostly architects having wet dreams about modernist glass boxes), the sun produces an effect called SOLAR HEAT GAIN. Sorry, but no amount of Low E coatings, interior blinds or thermally broken window frames can overcome the reality of having 100% glass. Even during the winter, solar heat gain can make it very uncomfortable to sit by the window’s edge.
Oh but wait, you’ll say to me that the building is north facing and is shaded by trees? Well, what about the east and west sides which will see sunlight for most of the day due to the high angle of the summer sun? By the time you recover the morning solar ambush, around 1pm you’ll find yourself attacked by the afternoon sun.
An no, automated blinds do not save the day because these solar shades are on the inside, and therefore the it is too late because the solar energy has already entered the building. Why build a glass box if you have to draw the blinds on all the windows?
Coffee table book architecture is sexy and enticing on paper, but in all practicalities, it becomes useless. How sustainable are we now? I bet that this owner (who was seduced by the salesman/woman-architect) will use this place for one season and then give up due to major thermal comfort issues.
Wait a year or two and you will be able to buy this non-functional space without having to pay for the architects fees.
ps….re: the authors text:
“The compelling qualities of simple, open spaces; interior and exterior unity and material clarity are transformed to enhance the environmental and programmatic performance of the building, creating architecture of both iconic resonance and innovative context–driven design.”
I’m sorry but this is a load of crap. Can someone please explain to me how “material clarity” (an aesthetic issue) serves to enhance environmental performance?
Thanks