Pitch’s House by Iñaqui Carnicero
Spanish architect Iñaqui Carnicero designed the Pitch’s House in Madrid, Spain.

.
Pitch’s House by Iñaqui Carnicero
The house is located in a small neighbourhood on the west boundaries of Madrid in a place called “los Peñascales”, that mean something as well as great stones. The plot is characterized to have a great slope oriented to the south and have two great granite rocks partially covered by moss. The structure of the house at a functional level as formal is explained perfectly in section. The underground level is used to solve the encounter with the slope of the land.
It incorporates two granite rocks, one of them structurally and other as an articulation that makes the main access to the house. The ceiling of the underground level generates the white floor made of calcareus stone that constitutes the noble plane where the daily life is developed. A single space opened to the south only close by glass that disappears to incorporate the water plane of the swimming pool in a first plane and the mount named “el pardo” in a second.
This closure does not fit with the perimeter of the first floor but moves inside to generated two porches at the ends and a marquee on the front that allows the entrance of rays of the sun in winter and is protected of its impact during the warm months of summer. The first floor is been thought like a closed box made of concrete that floats over the glass of the ground floor. Here is where the rest of the rooms are organized as well as the zones destined to the study.
A unique bay window located at 1,40 meter of height allows to trim the skyline of the landscape and uniformly illuminates the concrete ceiling. The independence of levels is only interrupted by two double heights that put in relation both spaces described previously. The economic restrictions have caused that the house is solved with the minimal possible gestures that nevertheless generates a great diversity of spaces and attractive situations.
.
Visit Iñaqui Carnicero’s website – here.
.
.


























Cathi Walton on 21 Mar 2011 at 2:48 pm #
Completely blown away. This is the house in my dreams.
KDS on 21 Mar 2011 at 3:02 pm #
I’m confused. Is this one house or two (basically identical) side-by side units? Photos and plan contradict each other.
tarynn on 21 Mar 2011 at 3:07 pm #
the furniture could have better scale and arrangement. otherwise I love the home.
shane on 21 Mar 2011 at 5:14 pm #
great job. Probably wouldn’t have chosen that wood (stain?) for the bookshelf but overall fantastic
ariana roberts on 21 Mar 2011 at 5:45 pm #
nice,but i think it could use a bit more color
Nicole Landau on 22 Mar 2011 at 12:16 am #
I am in love! This is my dream home!
Thomas on 22 Mar 2011 at 8:19 am #
Beautiful. My kind of space. Think once the landscape has recovered and some plants have been introduced to the main outside areas its going to be utopia
Bjz on 22 Mar 2011 at 9:20 am #
I love it immensely! Fantastic views! The only thing i’d change is the interior furnishings, i’d choose Marcio Kogan to do the interior designing etc.
AJ on 22 Mar 2011 at 9:57 am #
I like it, but feels like car park with all that cement look. Feels the ceiling is too low in the living room.
Shi on 22 Mar 2011 at 2:37 pm #
Completely agree with AJ. Like it, but the cement just seems so heavy in places, especially the interior low ceilings. However, like Thomas said, that same cement would look incredible crawling with vines for example.
kmg on 23 Mar 2011 at 6:32 pm #
i’m kinda surprised at the enthusiasm for this design… i personally love exposed concrete, but this just looks lifeless to me.
think it has something to do with the lack of contrast. there are no meaningful visual offsets to the monolithic base material. sigh.
further, the images don’t really give a feel for the “flow” or circulation or how the spaces interrelate. and the “fenestrations” seem to be dominated little slits in an all-conquering mass of stone. just can’t really attach to this one…
Alex on 24 Mar 2011 at 10:02 am #
the lack of contraste to all the cement gives it the charm of a german world war 2 bunker.
the wood used for the windows dosent work at all for me.
Alex on 24 Mar 2011 at 10:04 am #
p.s. what the point of the great view if the upstairs has those small window strip its a bit like the shooting openings in a bunker
oran on 24 Mar 2011 at 7:53 pm #
I too don’t get all the fawning over this project…really?…a dream home?…completely blown away? For me that huge concrete mass on those slender columns looks weak (scary)…the spaces look dim and definitely cold…I imagine it’s dreary inside at night.
Its an interesting exercise in exposed concrete but……..
nulla on 27 Mar 2011 at 9:57 am #
I like the use of concrete and the simple shape, but the building lacks some sort of dialogue with the context, as some others have already pointed out a bit more “openness” wouldn`t have damaged the project.
Nicolas on 30 Mar 2011 at 5:53 am #
Humm… Designed by Field Marshal E. Rommel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Normandy_bunker_command_post.JPG
slotmebeautiful on 03 Apr 2011 at 8:29 pm #
@ nulla. It’s preposterous to suggest ‘openness’ when that would clearly have contradicted the ego-driven imperative to incorporate slits and slots a la mode. All sundry concerns such as liveability must at all costs be subsumed by the drive to approach, but not catch and CERTAINLY not overtake fashion.